
In 
Conscience and Its Enemies,
 Princeton professor Robert George has several aims.  He contests the 
liberal consensus by demonstrating that there are reasonable arguments 
that can be made for the conservative positions on such issues as 
abortion and gay marriage.  He also seeks to convince economic and 
social conservatives that their aims coincide - that a more socially 
conservative culture would remove many of the justifications for big 
government, and that governmental intrusion into the social sphere is 
corrosive of the values treasured by social conservatives.  Finally, he 
defends the right of conscientious dissent in an environment where the 
ideal of tolerance increasingly demands ideological conformity.
 
The book is clearly written and carefully reasoned.  
George engages seriously with opposing viewpoints, revealing that the 
differences often begin with the unexamined premises of the opposing 
camps.  In the tradition of thinkers such as John Courtney Murray, he 
expounds the importance of freedom of conscience in society - not the 
freedom to do as we please, but rather the freedom to do what we believe
 is right, even when it is unpleasant - against the "dictatorship of 
relativism".
The book is marred by the fact that the last quarter 
consists of unrelated, previously published profiles of notable 
individuals.  The profiles were well-written and interesting on their 
own, but the thematic disconnect highlighted their nature as filler and 
detracted from the rest of the book.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment